Difference between revisions of "User:Ziggy/Website/Rationale"
m (→Opting out) |
(→RBEM) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== RBEM == | == RBEM == | ||
| + | The project is de intended, specifically, to test and implement the Resource-Based Economic Model ([[RBEM]]) socioeconomic system. Unlike most everything else in the project, implementing RBEM is a premise, and not a function of any other more basic purpose. The project's objectives are aligned with those generally shared by most RBEM supporters, namely, transcends the problems of politics, poverty, and war<ref>Taken from Jacque Fresco's book on RBE's title ''The Best That Money Can't Buy: Beyond Politics, Poverty, & War''</ref>. As a result of its quality of being a premise of the project, the choice doesn't require a reason, rationale, or justification, nor it is up for debate or modification. However, it is important noting two considerations: | ||
| + | * The RBEM socioeconomic system is not clearly defined, so the RBE10K is required to create a definition of its own, which might be dissimilar to interpretations or definitions made by other RBEM supporting or implementation projects | ||
| + | * The project does not intend on implementing a perfect or ideal RBEM socioeconomic system, but a reasonable implementation of it, as close as practicable to the project's own definition | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the short life of the project so far there has been a number of concerns about the project's choice of implementing an RBEM socioeconomic system, some of which are the following: | ||
| + | * An RBEM system lacks a degree of spirituality and connection with Nature needed to function ''(often by those with an inclination on permaculture-based society)'' | ||
| + | * An RBEM system is unnecessarily large, complex, and difficult to implement ''(often by those inclined on implementing an eco-village)'' | ||
| + | * Change can only be the result of political action and mobilisation, relying on current institutions ''(often by those with experience in political activism)'' | ||
| + | * RBEM is communism and it has been tried and tested and it is well known it failed ''(often by anticommunists)'' | ||
| + | * RBEM is a utopia, nobody would work or do anything and would be doom to failure ''(often by people who identify themselves as "sceptics")'' | ||
| + | * RBEM is either a scam to seal people's money, or a cult that brainwashes people ''(often by conspiracy theorists)'' | ||
| + | * People are selfish and violent, and society requires law to bring order, and a State to enforce it ''(a very common concern)'' | ||
| + | * People have a right to property, trade, develop wealth, and carry weapons to defend it ''(often by republicans, neoliberals, and right-wing libertarians)'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | In terms of the specific RBEM implementation strategy by the project, many have expressed objection or concerns, some of which have been the following: | ||
| + | * An RBEM system is not a true RBEM system unless is global, and wouldn't work otherwise ''(often by supporters of The Venus Project or The Zeitgeist Movement)'' | ||
| + | * An RBEM must not be implemented using of money, but with resources only ''(a common concern by residents of nations other than wealthy European ones)'' | ||
| + | * An RBEM system requires at least matching our current level of lifestyle and comfort, requiring hi-tech ''(a very concern by residents of wealthy nations)'' | ||
== Simple living == | == Simple living == | ||
Revision as of 02:32, 25 July 2013
RBE10K Project Rationale
Notions that support and justify the project's strategy, to better understand its form, function, and goal.
Contents |
Opting out
Opting out is presented in this project as the most effective form of achieving social and environmental sustainability. Opting out is decidedly non-confrontational, non-violent, and voluntary. Opting out can be either the result of personal choice (conscious living), a social stance (activism), or both. In the case of a community implementing the RBE10K design and strategy, which of the motivations is not imposed, and therefore the rationale for opting out is personal and may arise from a variety of factors, and pursue a variety of purposes.
Opting out is a form of abstinence from that which one personally regards as negative despite its commonality in a given culture or paradigm. It can be evidenced in other lifestyles and beliefs, such as vegetarianism and veganism, celibacy, abstinence from alcohol and psychoactive drugs, Amish Anabaptism, ascetism, etc. The concept of opting out can be considered different from that of choice (i.e. preferring one thing over another), such as migration from urban to rural setting or adoption of a different culture or beliefs, and can also be considered different than refusing to participate in what is not mainstream, such as refusing to consume human flesh or that of animals culturally associated as human companions, practicing sexual acts with people under certain age, or abstain from assisting with a suicide.
The RBE10K Project is based not only on opting out from the monetary market system, but also abstain from many cultural traits, beliefs, and traditions. Adoption of a RBE10K-based lifestyle requires voluntary and conscientious opting-out of any of the following:
- Rights, especially the following:
- Right to ownership or property (including what is commonly referred to intellectual property, and anything other than our own bodies or personal effects)
- Right to seek or take personal advantage (including being deceitful or manipulative)
- Right to claim superiority to other lifeforms (including people)
- Right to make demands from others (including compensation for damages, whereas physical or emotional)
- Right to privileges based on greater personal effort or work (privileges can be granted, not as rights, but for practicality in the fulfilment of a responsibility such as guardianship)
- Disruption or destruction of ecosystems for comfort or convenience, especially when there are non-disruptive alternatives
- Imposing personal points of view (usually perceived as the truth) on others (including children under care, regardless of being the parent)
- Giving orders, or choosing or deciding for others (except when such privilege had been voluntarily granted, or socially accepted, such as caring for toddlers)
Opting out from the monetary system doesn't mean severing relations with the outside world, but rather willingly abstaining (as much as practicable) from engaging in specific practices that are commonplace, such as labour and commerce. It does not exclude travelling outside the community, maintaining communication, or accessing goods and services provided free of charge. RBE10K communities would actively participate alongside with the monetary market world in several areas, such as academia, producing and sharing art, research and development in sciences and technology, and use and production of goods and services provided free of charge.
RBEM
The project is de intended, specifically, to test and implement the Resource-Based Economic Model (RBEM) socioeconomic system. Unlike most everything else in the project, implementing RBEM is a premise, and not a function of any other more basic purpose. The project's objectives are aligned with those generally shared by most RBEM supporters, namely, transcends the problems of politics, poverty, and war<ref>Taken from Jacque Fresco's book on RBE's title The Best That Money Can't Buy: Beyond Politics, Poverty, & War</ref>. As a result of its quality of being a premise of the project, the choice doesn't require a reason, rationale, or justification, nor it is up for debate or modification. However, it is important noting two considerations:
- The RBEM socioeconomic system is not clearly defined, so the RBE10K is required to create a definition of its own, which might be dissimilar to interpretations or definitions made by other RBEM supporting or implementation projects
- The project does not intend on implementing a perfect or ideal RBEM socioeconomic system, but a reasonable implementation of it, as close as practicable to the project's own definition
In the short life of the project so far there has been a number of concerns about the project's choice of implementing an RBEM socioeconomic system, some of which are the following:
- An RBEM system lacks a degree of spirituality and connection with Nature needed to function (often by those with an inclination on permaculture-based society)
- An RBEM system is unnecessarily large, complex, and difficult to implement (often by those inclined on implementing an eco-village)
- Change can only be the result of political action and mobilisation, relying on current institutions (often by those with experience in political activism)
- RBEM is communism and it has been tried and tested and it is well known it failed (often by anticommunists)
- RBEM is a utopia, nobody would work or do anything and would be doom to failure (often by people who identify themselves as "sceptics")
- RBEM is either a scam to seal people's money, or a cult that brainwashes people (often by conspiracy theorists)
- People are selfish and violent, and society requires law to bring order, and a State to enforce it (a very common concern)
- People have a right to property, trade, develop wealth, and carry weapons to defend it (often by republicans, neoliberals, and right-wing libertarians)
In terms of the specific RBEM implementation strategy by the project, many have expressed objection or concerns, some of which have been the following:
- An RBEM system is not a true RBEM system unless is global, and wouldn't work otherwise (often by supporters of The Venus Project or The Zeitgeist Movement)
- An RBEM must not be implemented using of money, but with resources only (a common concern by residents of nations other than wealthy European ones)
- An RBEM system requires at least matching our current level of lifestyle and comfort, requiring hi-tech (a very concern by residents of wealthy nations)
