Template talk:POV-statement

1. REDIRECT w:Template:WikiProject Inline Templates

Style

px}} }} }} Resolved{{safesubst:#if:All inline templates now have a consistent style and are based on a meta-template.|:}} {{safesubst:#if:All inline templates now have a consistent style and are based on a meta-template.|All inline templates now have a consistent style and are based on a meta-template.}}

I think it is a bit too small and the brackets are too close to the text -- Snailwalker | talk 13:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

If you look at my original version, in the history, you may wish to adapt it. Computerjoe's talk 19:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I like that one better, but it would be nice to have someone else comment on this -- Snailwalker | talk 19:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

It was edited by w:User:HereToHelp as it was too lengthy. Perhaps a change to 'neutrality disputed. see talk.'? Computerjoe's talk 20:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Bracket spacing can be adjusted with   (thin space). For example, ^{[ neutrality disputed ]}. Thin spaces are sometimes used around em dashes. I don't know how compatible they are across browsers. Experiment and see. — mjb 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

They're not supported by all browsers and display inconsistently across those that do recognise them. — Saxifrage ✎ 05:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Talk Page

Since this is of line-item use, maybe it should take a parameter to point to a talk page section, rather than just pointing to the whole talk page?

I know it's hard to maintain the section links, if the sections of the talk page change, but I'd think if someone was taking the time to archive a talk page, that these would either be gone, replaced by a page dispute/pov, or be archived along with it.

If my suggestion comes to fruition, here is some language for the usage section:

To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{POV-statement|talk page section name}}.

—  <TALKJNDRLINETALK>    

Wikiproject Inline templates proposed

px}} }} }} Resolved{{safesubst:#if:Project exists and is active.|:}} {{safesubst:#if:Project exists and is active.|Project exists and is active.}}

w:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates. I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Category

Any objection changing the category here to Category:Articles with minor POV problems like the other inline neutrality templates?--BirgitteSB 17:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Linebreak.

Still causing linebreaks and therefor spaced boxes after template: [1]. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-19t13:52z