Difference between revisions of "RBE10K/Concerns"

From MediaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Concerns raised through discussion threads)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[The RBE10K Project]] intends to address all concerns raised, dealing with conflicts by documenting reasons for each claim and dispute, researching and quantifying the validity for each reason, and arriving at the best possible outcome to maximise the degree of consensus.
 
[[The RBE10K Project]] intends to address all concerns raised, dealing with conflicts by documenting reasons for each claim and dispute, researching and quantifying the validity for each reason, and arriving at the best possible outcome to maximise the degree of consensus.
  
== Concerns raised and addressed ==
+
== RBE10K Project name ==
* [[RBE10K Project Concerns: global-RBE vs local-RBE, abundance, inferior variety and technology - by TZM activist]]
+
{{ Main | RBE10K Project name }}
  
 +
The name of the [[RBE10K|RBE10K Project]] is contentious as a result of the inclusion of the accronim '''''RBE''''' as part of the name. Since [[TZM]] and [[TVP]] have been invested for several years in the advocacy of a form of [[RBEM]] which is dissimilar than that of the RBE10K Project, should the project become popular, the variances introduced by the project to the concept of a RBE using the same name could cause confusion and adverse effects in the perception of the objectives TZM and TVP have pursued throughout the years. Considering the longer history and invested effort in promoting TVP's original form of RBE, TVP and some TZM activists consider appropriate requesting that the RBE10K Project be renamed to prevent such potential confusion and adverse effects in popular perception.
  
http://egrouphub.com/wiki/index.php/RBE_Redefined
+
== Concerns raised through discussion threads ==
 
+
* [[/global-RBE vs local-RBE, abundance, inferior variety and technology - by TZM activist]]
http://egrouphub.com/wiki/index.php/(RBE)_theory
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
== Fatal Errors ==
+
 
+
 
+
http://egrouphub.com/wiki/index.php/RBE_Fatal_ERRORS
+
 
+
 
+
RBE Fatal ERRORS
+
RBE theory as proposed by RBE majority proponents is systemically impossible for a large variety of reasons. This is by no means a complete list.
+
 
+
1. Globalism. Of any kind, is not localization or self sufficiency, its systemic dependence and fascism.
+
 
+
2. Godbots. Watch the lanndru episode of star trek and get back to me.
+
 
+
3. No solid metaprocess. Any cult that can't even solve small time human communications problems without resorting to interpersonal fascism is in no position to take any kind of moral high ground and expound on even deeper social and civil matters. You can't save the world as trolling ad hominem junkies.
+
 
+
4. Anti Capitalism. The real solution is to use capitalism against itself and evolve our new system. Quit bellyachiing about the evil system and get off your computer and into the real world.
+
5. Atheism. Is just one more christian cult, not the high ground to claim in order to troll and look down on religious people.
+
 
+
6. Government. In our current form is evil, but Anarchism is also not a viable real solution.
+
 
+
7. Porches. Jaques designs are closed building with not enough opened spaces or exits, they look like prisons.
+
 
+
8. Macro internal spaces. A big building on the outside is a lot less impressive if its claustrophobic on the inside.
+

Latest revision as of 00:54, 27 February 2013

The RBE10K Project intends to address all concerns raised, dealing with conflicts by documenting reasons for each claim and dispute, researching and quantifying the validity for each reason, and arriving at the best possible outcome to maximise the degree of consensus.

[edit] RBE10K Project name

{{#ifeq:|Category|The main {{#ifeq:||article|page}}{{#if:|s}} for this category {{#if:|are|is}}|Main {{#ifeq:||article|page}}{{#if:|s}}:}} RBE10K Project name {{#if:
|{{#if:|, | and }}[[{{{2}}}|{{{2}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{3}}}|{{{3}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{4}}}|{{{4}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{5}}}|{{{5}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{6}}}|{{{6}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{7}}}|{{{7}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{8}}}|{{{8}}}]]}}{{#if:
|{{#if:|, |, and }}[[{{{9}}}|{{{9}}}]]}}{{#if:
|, and [[{{{10}}}|{{{10}}}]]}}{{#if: | (too many parameters in {{main}})}}

The name of the RBE10K Project is contentious as a result of the inclusion of the accronim RBE as part of the name. Since TZM and TVP have been invested for several years in the advocacy of a form of RBEM which is dissimilar than that of the RBE10K Project, should the project become popular, the variances introduced by the project to the concept of a RBE using the same name could cause confusion and adverse effects in the perception of the objectives TZM and TVP have pursued throughout the years. Considering the longer history and invested effort in promoting TVP's original form of RBE, TVP and some TZM activists consider appropriate requesting that the RBE10K Project be renamed to prevent such potential confusion and adverse effects in popular perception.

[edit] Concerns raised through discussion threads

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox