Difference between revisions of "Peritia school/Presentation"

From MediaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The following is a work in progress draft and notes for the presentation at ZDay in Brisbane in March 2017.
 
The following is a work in progress draft and notes for the presentation at ZDay in Brisbane in March 2017.
  
== Off-grid (1.4'-1.8') ==
+
== Off-grid (1') ==
Off-grid (slide: word in capitals). Many of us have dreamed with this. Earthship and strawbale buildings (pic slide), solar and wind power (pic slide), growing our own food (pic slide). Many of us associate NL/RBE with off-grid (word slide). However, it has been a defining feature of The Zeitgeist Movement to argue for staying in the cities and raising awareness from our current homes and within our current lifestyles. It is argued that if we leave the cities to protect ourselves from an impending collapse of the system, instead of being safe our homesteads will be the hungry mobs' first target. I personally can't agree more.
+
Off-grid (slide: word in capitals). Something many of us dream about. Earthships and strawbale buildings (pic slide), solar and wind power (pic slide), growing our own food (pic slide). Many of us even associate Natural Law/RBE with off-grid, even though The Zeitgeist Movement advocates raising awareness within our communities, and that going off-grid is pointless in the end because when the system collapses, our homesteads will be the first targets of hungry mobs.
  
However, the situation is not that simple. The system has been collapsing for thirty years, and although it may be argued that it is accelerating, people are also adapting and adjusting at an accelerating rate to keep up with technology. By the looks of it, it seems like disasters due to climate change will happen sooner than the total collapse of system, which might actually help the system survive rather than challenge it.
+
However, the situation is not that simple. It can be argued that the system has been collapsing for the last thirty years, and even if the collapse is actually accelerating, people are also adapting and adjusting at an accelerating rate along with technology advances. Climate change is likely to be greater and more imminent impact globally, which, just like war, is likely to assist Capitalism rather than challenge it.
  
== Circular city (1-1.3') ==
+
== Circular city (2') ==
(slide: circular city). Who here hasn't been inspired by this very image? Who of us would say "no" if we were invited to one? (slide: TVP city close-up image) How much would we be willing to work, or to compromise, for the opportunity to inhabit in a city like this? (slide: TVP science-fictiony image) These designs spark our imagination, but how viable are they? How feasible, especially if built with resources obtained in the monetary system?
+
''(* brief pause *)''
  
(slide: circular city again) If we can't have something like this because it would be too expensive, and we can't rely on the system collapsing soon enough, what are our options other than painfully keep dreaming, and raising awareness among people that are mostly sceptical of the alternative socio-economic system we promote? Can't we have something similar in essence, but within our reach?
+
(slide: circular city). Who here hasn't been inspired by this image? Who among us wouldn't join one if we get a chance? (slide: TVP city close-up image) Would you compromise on your current lifestyle? Give up on some degree of convenience or comfort? What would you sacrifice? How much would we be willing to work for the opportunity to inhabit in a city like this? (slide: TVP science-fictiony image) These designs have certainly sparked our imagination and given us hope for a decade now. But, how viable are they? How feasible to be built in and along with the current mainstream socio-economic system?
  
I think we can, and also that we must. Not to escape this system, not for our own personal sake, but rather to have something in concrete to show when promoting our alternative, and most importantly, to experiment with, and to develop from an empirical standpoint, from evidence and in practice, rather than philosophy alone.
+
(slide: circular city again) Let's say this is a generic concept design for an average city once the world had largely adopted a post-scarcity socio-economic system. Building one today would require trillions of dollars, and while it would provide comfort and possibly a high degree of self-sufficiency, some needed resources would become scarce, requiring some degree of trade with the outside world. But in any case, how would building one city like this, an impossibly expensive one-of-a-kind, help the rest of the world transitioning to Natural Law/RBE? And if we don't do something like this, what can we do other than continue to raise awareness in the hope that at some point this idea will go viral?
 +
 
 +
I think there's a lot we can do, and that we must begin trialing this new socio-economic system. Not as a way to escape the current system, but rather to strengthen and solidify our proposal, to put it to test, evaluate pros and cons, moving from a realm of philosophy and speculation and into a realm of empirical data, with convincing and irrefutable arguments. We're a tiny minority of dreamers, with very limited financial resources and time availability. Capturing people's attention and winning their hearts will require much more than designs and philosophic arguments. Most people want to see before they try, want positive reviews from people they trust before committing to anything. If we're to seduce them, we have to show them.
  
 
== The RBE10K Project (5') ==
 
== The RBE10K Project (5') ==
(slide: RBE10K logo) RBE ten thousand is a project that aims at creating the blueprints for self-sufficient, sustainable, affordable, viable and realistic types of settlement, adopting the core tenets of NL/RBE. The RBE ten thousand project is defined by these goals and constraints, along with a gradual implementation strategy for global adoption in fourty years.
+
(slide: RBE10K logo) RBE ten thousand is a project that aims at creating the blueprints for self-sufficient, sustainable, affordable, viable and realistic types of settlement that adopting the core tenets of Natural Law/RBE.
  
* (slide: M-RBE bullet point) To implement NL/RBE we must first define it well. This is a vastly complex topic, since it requires designing a whole socioeconomic system, when all other socioeconomic systems emerged naturally, like language. MRBE aims at being a small, simplified, practical and experimental form of NL/RBE, aimed at a small-to-medium community of volunteers to live in an experimental setting, and with minimal resources. Some essential characteristics would include defining clearly the goals and values of the community, privileging the providing for needs, access rather than ownership, cooperation, automated production, management and coordination where possible, intelligent and goals-focused decision-making, non-violent communication, non-blaming, no privileges other than technical ones needed for fulfilling on the agreed needs of the community, and of course, no money or commerce or the pursuit of profit.
+
* (slide: M-RBE bullet point) The task of designing a socioeconomic system from scratch is mindbogglingly complex. It is intended to supersede all currently surviving socioeconomic systems, which emerged through hundreds or event thousands of years of gradual change and cultural evolution. Just like the waterfall software design approach, Minimalist-RBE aims at beginning small, simple, practical and experimental, initially requiring being implemented by volunteers and activists willing to live in an experimental setting and with minimal resources, and allowing the system to evolve through practice. The initial design would be limited to key goals and values for the community, most of which we're familiar with, such as access rather than ownership, cooperation instead of competition, automated production and intelligent management. And of course, no money and no trade.
* (slide: self-sufficiency bullet point) How can a city be self-sufficient in today's globalised world? Self-sufficiency is an ideal that can only be achieved to a certain degree. So the project must define an acceptable degree of self-sufficiency, such as producing its own energy and water, sufficiently nourishing food, and the ability to repair, reuse and recycle most of its goods and resources. This would require a population large and varied in skills enough to support itself.
+
* (slide: self-sufficiency bullet point) Self-sufficiency can only be achieved to a degree in today's globalised world. This project seeks an acceptable, minimalist, degree of self-sufficiency, such as producing its own energy, water and food, a population large enough to cater for a variety of knowledge and skills, and the ability to repair, reuse and recycle most of its goods and resources for at least a few years.
* (slide: sustainability bullet point) By sustainability we refer to the capacity to endure: achieving dynamic equilibrium with the environment. Also, sustainability here is meant in all of its forms: personal, interpersonal, social and environmental.
+
* (slide: sustainability bullet point) Sustainability is the capacity to endure, that is, achieving dynamic equilibrium with the environment in all four realms: personal, interpersonal, social and environmental.
* (slide: affordability bullet point) The resources for a settlement like this, including the human resources to populate it, must be obtained in the world we live in, i.e. the monetary market. Even if a multibillionaire donated enough resources to get one going, that would be limited to one, and would make an implementation dependent on some crazy super-rich agent. So to have this project being viable, it must be financed by the very people inhabiting it, initially to a degree average activists in rich nations can afford, and with a view to gradually reducing this cost in subsequent implementations, so that new settlements are increasingly more affordable.
+
* (slide: affordability bullet point) Implementing this project will require resources that by and large can only be obtained with money. We propose that it be self financed by those involved, and with a budget set to a level that allows the project to be replicated by other people, and aiming at gradually reducing costs in subsequent implementations, and thus increasing affordability.
* (slide: viability bullet point) A settlement like this would require complying with local and regional laws and regulations for housing and social arrangements, have legal and health protections, all while being allowed to exist but without participating in the monetary economy or producing wealth. This is probably the most difficult requirement to achieve. It would also require that its population is small enough to be manageable and to not be seen as a health hazard or a legal or social threat by the local government.
+
* (slide: viability bullet point) Any settlement requires complying with local and regional laws and regulations for housing, social organisation, legal and health protections, etc. Our settlements would not only be required to comply with all this, but also do so with the minimal resources intended, and without participating in the formal economy. This is probably the most difficult obstacle for this project, so it must be strategic in terms of format and location.
* (slide: realistic bullet point) All in all, a settlement like this must be realistic in terms of providing a lifestyle that is, in practice, more desirable for those who can afford implementing this one when compared with what the monetary market can offer them. Perhaps trading convenience for freedom, comfort for greater human interaction, sophistication for engagement.
+
* (slide: realistic bullet point) To succeed, Minimalist RBE settlement must provide a lifestyle that is, in practice and despite material limitations, desirable enough for its population to remain and for others to seek replicating it.
  
 
== The RBE10K Project's format and strategy 10' ==
 
== The RBE10K Project's format and strategy 10' ==

Revision as of 19:06, 16 December 2016

The following is a work in progress draft and notes for the presentation at ZDay in Brisbane in March 2017.

Contents

Off-grid (1')

Off-grid (slide: word in capitals). Something many of us dream about. Earthships and strawbale buildings (pic slide), solar and wind power (pic slide), growing our own food (pic slide). Many of us even associate Natural Law/RBE with off-grid, even though The Zeitgeist Movement advocates raising awareness within our communities, and that going off-grid is pointless in the end because when the system collapses, our homesteads will be the first targets of hungry mobs.

However, the situation is not that simple. It can be argued that the system has been collapsing for the last thirty years, and even if the collapse is actually accelerating, people are also adapting and adjusting at an accelerating rate along with technology advances. Climate change is likely to be greater and more imminent impact globally, which, just like war, is likely to assist Capitalism rather than challenge it.

Circular city (2')

(* brief pause *)

(slide: circular city). Who here hasn't been inspired by this image? Who among us wouldn't join one if we get a chance? (slide: TVP city close-up image) Would you compromise on your current lifestyle? Give up on some degree of convenience or comfort? What would you sacrifice? How much would we be willing to work for the opportunity to inhabit in a city like this? (slide: TVP science-fictiony image) These designs have certainly sparked our imagination and given us hope for a decade now. But, how viable are they? How feasible to be built in and along with the current mainstream socio-economic system?

(slide: circular city again) Let's say this is a generic concept design for an average city once the world had largely adopted a post-scarcity socio-economic system. Building one today would require trillions of dollars, and while it would provide comfort and possibly a high degree of self-sufficiency, some needed resources would become scarce, requiring some degree of trade with the outside world. But in any case, how would building one city like this, an impossibly expensive one-of-a-kind, help the rest of the world transitioning to Natural Law/RBE? And if we don't do something like this, what can we do other than continue to raise awareness in the hope that at some point this idea will go viral?

I think there's a lot we can do, and that we must begin trialing this new socio-economic system. Not as a way to escape the current system, but rather to strengthen and solidify our proposal, to put it to test, evaluate pros and cons, moving from a realm of philosophy and speculation and into a realm of empirical data, with convincing and irrefutable arguments. We're a tiny minority of dreamers, with very limited financial resources and time availability. Capturing people's attention and winning their hearts will require much more than designs and philosophic arguments. Most people want to see before they try, want positive reviews from people they trust before committing to anything. If we're to seduce them, we have to show them.

The RBE10K Project (5')

(slide: RBE10K logo) RBE ten thousand is a project that aims at creating the blueprints for self-sufficient, sustainable, affordable, viable and realistic types of settlement that adopting the core tenets of Natural Law/RBE.

  • (slide: M-RBE bullet point) The task of designing a socioeconomic system from scratch is mindbogglingly complex. It is intended to supersede all currently surviving socioeconomic systems, which emerged through hundreds or event thousands of years of gradual change and cultural evolution. Just like the waterfall software design approach, Minimalist-RBE aims at beginning small, simple, practical and experimental, initially requiring being implemented by volunteers and activists willing to live in an experimental setting and with minimal resources, and allowing the system to evolve through practice. The initial design would be limited to key goals and values for the community, most of which we're familiar with, such as access rather than ownership, cooperation instead of competition, automated production and intelligent management. And of course, no money and no trade.
  • (slide: self-sufficiency bullet point) Self-sufficiency can only be achieved to a degree in today's globalised world. This project seeks an acceptable, minimalist, degree of self-sufficiency, such as producing its own energy, water and food, a population large enough to cater for a variety of knowledge and skills, and the ability to repair, reuse and recycle most of its goods and resources for at least a few years.
  • (slide: sustainability bullet point) Sustainability is the capacity to endure, that is, achieving dynamic equilibrium with the environment in all four realms: personal, interpersonal, social and environmental.
  • (slide: affordability bullet point) Implementing this project will require resources that by and large can only be obtained with money. We propose that it be self financed by those involved, and with a budget set to a level that allows the project to be replicated by other people, and aiming at gradually reducing costs in subsequent implementations, and thus increasing affordability.
  • (slide: viability bullet point) Any settlement requires complying with local and regional laws and regulations for housing, social organisation, legal and health protections, etc. Our settlements would not only be required to comply with all this, but also do so with the minimal resources intended, and without participating in the formal economy. This is probably the most difficult obstacle for this project, so it must be strategic in terms of format and location.
  • (slide: realistic bullet point) To succeed, Minimalist RBE settlement must provide a lifestyle that is, in practice and despite material limitations, desirable enough for its population to remain and for others to seek replicating it.

The RBE10K Project's format and strategy 10'

(slide: RBE10K logo - Format: 10,000 x 10,000) The RBE ten thousand Project intends to create a variety of models, or recipes, for implementation of Minimalistic RBE settlements. The project's name derives from the initial proposed combination of population and funding goals: ten thousand people, each contributing ten thousand US dollars. The RBE ten thousand Project is not tied to this specific combination, however, each combination choice defines the scale and the budget required for its implementation. Work on alternative combinations can provide valuable insights in terms of pros and cons for each strategy.

The default population goal aims at a balance between manageability and a capability for self-sufficiency, as well as capable of providing a sense of belonging and relatedness without feeling insular, and provide rich in variety of activities and entertainment without the alienation and the social unaccountability that results from anonymity. And the default funding goal is an amount that can deliver a workable lifestyle, and affordable for a significant number of RBE supporters would would love to pilot the project.

The project doesn't just aim at creating one Minimalistic RBE settlement: it defines a clear path for global adoption. It proposes that RBE ten thousand settlements, rather than being adopted in existing populations, be built always from scratch and in isolation. They must be designed from the ground up for consistency with the core values and principles of Natural Law/RBE, and as a way to opt-out from the monetary system in a way that is legal and achievable. Since no society would happily enable people to opt-out from the formal economy, it is required that these settlements are very rapidly adopted everywhere, faster than governments could deal with or try to fight off.

(slide: RBE10K logo - Strategy: exponential adoption) This implementation strategy, capable of reaching global adoption in just forty years, is inspired in simple biological processes. (slide: video of a cell growing) Just like living cells, each settlement would focus at first on securing reasonable degree of workability, sustainability and self-sufficiency, ideally a period no longer than twelve months. (slide: video of a cell splitting) Once established, every settlement's goal shifts focus to sponsoring a sister settlement elsewhere in the world, organising it, providing assistance, know-how, resources and materials for its initial set-up. Just like living cells grow and split into two (a process called mitosis), no settlement other than the very first one would start from scratch.

(slides: relevant images) The first ones to adopt MRBE would be mainly enthusiasts from all over the world, and later followed by those attracted by videos of the first or second settlements shared in social media. As the number of settlements grow, implementation costs would go down and become accessible to impoverished or warn-torn populations, increasingly absorbing the slave-wage workforce from industry, mining, agriculture and services, and that way start to destabilise the system and weaken the system. RBEM settlements would grow more more attractive to those at the bottom of the hierarchy of social privileges, until the top one percent, no longer supported by cheap labour and unable to sustain their lifestyle, would finally relinquish their useless property.

(slide: video of the world with random green dots growing exponentially as a year counter ticks) If, on average, each settlement goes through mitosis every two years, the population of MRBE settlements would then double every two years, reaching eighty thousand in six years, one million in fourteen, ten million in twenty, one hundred million in eight years later, one billion before 2050, and finally the whole population six years later. As these settlements spread and absorb population opting-out from the monetary system, total land use for human activities would rapidly decline, and by 2060 we could allow ecosystems and wildlife to reclaim ninety-nine percent of land used today, securing the biodiversity we depend on for our long-term survival. The whole of humanity would live within its means, sustainably, without polluting or degrading the environment any longer.

Peritia School

(slide: Peritia School logo - Peritia: A proof of concept)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox